Submitted by XalosXandrez t3_zuyy3j in MachineLearning
curiousshortguy t1_j1s504a wrote
Reply to comment by Iwannabeaviking in [D] Are reviewer blacklists actually implemented at ML conferences? by XalosXandrez
> whilst some conferences are American yes, not all are
The ones OP mentions (ICML / ICLR / NeurIPS) are though.
> Blacklist is a universal term and is not offensive and trying to say so is stupid so changing the language to appease a small minority of people is stupid
There's enoguh science to back up that this is probably not stupid:
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6007773/
but of course, if you don't care about a minority because they're a minority, you can go ahead and do whatever you want to do. You just might be an inconsiderate asshat then.
Iwannabeaviking t1_j1s5nxt wrote
of course, it matters to the individual and for the individual to concern themselves with.
The concept of science is the detail within, not the language used as long as the result is shown to be what is proven/unproven.
[deleted] t1_j1zto9l wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments