Submitted by EntireInflation8663 t3_zr8zfc in MachineLearning
WaterAirFireEarth t1_j12dahs wrote
Sources does not = factually correct. Many humans that cite articles don’t read the full article, misrepresent the work, or are biased to (e.g.) famous or familiar authors.
EntireInflation8663 OP t1_j12eec9 wrote
I want the sources in order to cross-verify the output. I understand that the sources given would not necessarily agree with the model, but in a way, this system could act as a better query for peer-reviewed sources (or any, for that matter).
WaterAirFireEarth t1_j12epqz wrote
That’s interesting! Unfortunately I don’t know the resource you’re looking for. But it really all is just one big game of telephone, unfortunately. Maybe I’m just cynical about the ingenuity of all our “data.” :)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments