Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Hyper1on t1_j0wrenm wrote

Reply to comment by czar_el in [D] Will there be a replacement for Machine Learning Twitter? by MrAcurite

Obviously very different situations, since plane inspections are actually reliable. These days I don't view a preprint as any different to a NeurIPS paper, since if I read the preprint and think it's good then essentially the only difference is that one has passed the NeurIPS reviewer lottery. I advise all ML researchers to just trust themselves, read the preprint, and if they think it's valuable then feel free to cite it.

2

dinkboz t1_j0xr6xg wrote

Im just knocking on ML researchers for citing preprints all the time lol. This is very much frowned upon in mechanical engineering (I apply ML to mechE problems), so Im just giving you guys a hard time for doing things differently. In most of the cases, I don’t think it’s a big issue.

1