Submitted by No-Stay9943 t3_zovnxo in MachineLearning
lolillini t1_j0qexfe wrote
Reply to comment by Celmeno in [R] Getting arXiv article published. Endorsement needed, cs. by No-Stay9943
And what makes you think that (i) every good paper would be published in a conference/journal, and (ii) every paper that is published in a good conference/journal is good. My experience says both of these are wrong.
Celmeno t1_j0qh32a wrote
The vast majority of good papers (95+%) will be properly published after a while. This has been thee reality for decades.
Not every paper there will be good. There are mediocre conferences with amazing papers. There are top conferences with questionable papers. Regardless, the tendency is still clear.
I will gladly give OP feedback. But to state that publishing is not the primary way to get research out is just disingenuous
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments