Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

VordeMan t1_j09ik5r wrote

A lot of Murray's arguments break down completely when the LLM has been RLHF-ed, or otherwise finetuned (i.e., the case we care about), which is a bit shocking to me (did no one point this out?). I guess that's supposed to be the point of peer review :)

Given that fact, it's unclear to me how useful this paper is....

11

Nameless1995 t1_j09m8ir wrote

Footnote 1 Page 2. It's a bit of a wishy washy statement with no clear point but he does mention RLHF.

7