Submitted by fedegarzar t3_zk6h8q in MachineLearning
Mark8472 t1_izygeei wrote
Reply to comment by fedegarzar in [Discussion] Amazon's AutoML vs. open source statistical methods by fedegarzar
I get that. But since it doesn’t show the full picture the conclusion is misleading.
marr75 t1_izywb2h wrote
If they were using a custom python pipeline for the statistical models, yeah, I could see this argument. But, like many of the Nixtla tools:
!conda install -c conda-forge statsforecast
import sf
sf.fit(Xzero, yzero)
yone = sf.predict(Xone)
This is a pretty common "marketing" post format from Nixtla. I think they make good tools and good points, so I'm not at all mad about it. They're providing a ready to use tool (StatsForecast) and making a great point about it's performance and cost vs the AWS alternative. Asking for the total cost of developing and maintaining statsforecast means you'd have to also account for the total cost and complexity of developing and maintaining AmazonForecast...
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments