Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

RaptorDotCpp t1_iznoyl6 wrote

It's wrong though. range does not return a list. It has its own sequence type.

160

elbiot t1_izoh372 wrote

It was trained on python 2

36

maxToTheJ t1_izqh53h wrote

So overfit because its lack of generalization ie still wrong

0

jsonathan OP t1_iznwsl6 wrote

I noticed that. Generally it’s “right enough” to help you fix your error, though.

27

_poisonedrationality t1_izoe2xm wrote

I wouldn't say that. While I'm definitely impressed by its abilities It makes mistakes way too often for me to consider it "generally correct".

It is interesting that even when it makes a mistake it often has some reasonable sounding logic behind it. It makes it feel like it has some level of "understanding".

85

artsybashev t1_izorw1t wrote

yeah it is annoyingly confidently wrong. Even when you point out its mistake, it might try to explain like no mistakes where made. Sometimes it admits that there was a mistake. From a coworker this would be really annoying behaviour.

57

new_name_who_dis_ t1_izou962 wrote

Crazy that we are now far enough into AI research that we are comparing chatbots to coworkers.

40

artsybashev t1_izoujfv wrote

Yeah. A lot of times I get a better answer from chatgpt but you really need to take its responses witha grain of salt

8

jsonathan OP t1_izt0lfi wrote

In my experience, it has explained every error I’ve encountered in a way that’s at least directionally correct. Can you post a counterexample?

3

knowledgebass t1_izr3dpl wrote

You know people make a lot of mistakes, too, right?

1

_poisonedrationality t1_izr9ksp wrote

Yes. But I still wouldn't say it's "generally correct" because it makes mistakes far too often.

2

cr125rider t1_izolvlz wrote

Iterable go brrr without using all your memory

2