Submitted by Harry_Superman t3_ze2dq1 in MachineLearning
This is the discussion for EACL 2023 reviews.
Comments
yashkumaratri t1_iz4ny7h wrote
International-Rip958 t1_iz54x9m wrote
Can we use ChatGPT to generate better reviews? Just replace current random reviewers. Seems like some reviews in ML are even worse than the generated ones :P
ss_harry t1_iz5b8ii wrote
Reviews are out?
nepusr8 t1_iz5cbax wrote
I'm not seeing anything in the softconf portal.
[deleted] t1_iz6d8nz wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iz6pvlv wrote
[deleted]
Indianprerogative t1_iz6pvos wrote
4, 2.5, 2. Will withdraw and submit to a workshop.
Harry_Superman OP t1_iz6sfry wrote
3.5, 3.5, 3. Do I have a chance?
mathcircler t1_iz6xrqu wrote
Maybe anyone knows what was the distribution of scores for the accepted and rejected papers in the previous years? Or just the median score of the accepted papers?
Beginning-North4178 t1_iz7b35b wrote
certain_entropy t1_iz7dn00 wrote
always a reviewer 2 :(
Beneficial-Study-209 t1_iz7fab7 wrote
Accepted paper received averaged score more than 3.3
Unlucky-Difficulty86 t1_iz7lxp8 wrote
Does 3.5 3.5 2 stand a chance?
International-Rip958 t1_iz7z64m wrote
>3.5, 3.5, 3. Do I have a chance?
Got a paper with the same scores. I'd say it's around findings level. If the rebuttal can be done properly, it could enter the main.
SamChenPKU t1_iz807ps wrote
Does EACL have the "findings" track?
MillionWays_ t1_iz81f0q wrote
Are all the scores out? Where are they available?
appadiyum_solalam t1_iz81qz7 wrote
Yes. Check in the softconf profile. You would have a received an email also. Some papers currently have 2 reviews only.
MillionWays_ t1_iz82tr6 wrote
I don't see anything on softconf. No email as well. Who does the email come from?
International-Rip958 t1_iz835tz wrote
>Does EACL have the "findings" track?
Findings Proceedings
October 15, 2022. We will accept papers to Findings proceedings in addition to main conference proceedings, in line with recent ACL conferences.
appadiyum_solalam t1_iz839m6 wrote
Maybe the reviews for ur paper are delayed. This can happen sometimes. The email came from this address: papers_eacl2023@softconf.com
SamChenPKU t1_iz87mpl wrote
Thank you very much!
greekfiretime t1_iz8tz8n wrote
First-time author: 4.5, 3, 3. Is this enough for the main track?
Cotevool t1_iz8ucu8 wrote
Where did you obtain that statistic?
life_work_balance t1_iz9141b wrote
First-time author: 3.5, 3.5, 2.5. Is there a chance for findings?
certain_entropy t1_iz93wkz wrote
First-time author here as well scores were 3.5, 1.5, 3. I'm assuming I have no shot at Findings either.
mathcircler t1_iz94nco wrote
Is it based on personal experience or there is some stats? In the case of the latter, would greatly appreciate it if you could link the source. Thanks!
rduke79 t1_iz96rvs wrote
This comes to mind https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.00176
Harry_Superman OP t1_iz98d1m wrote
FaithlessnessRecent9 t1_iz9ckhb wrote
Hi, it means that you may have a shot convincing Rev 2 to raise their scores. It's not over until it's over, frankly. I managed to turn the odds a couple of times in similar situations.
Good luck
certain_entropy t1_iz9cu0z wrote
I appreciate the encouragement! Fingers crossed we'll see how it goes.
Kindly_Mastodon1283 t1_ize7vec wrote
5, 4 ,4 seems like reviewers like our work a lot XD
GodkillerArthur t1_izp9njn wrote
My scores are 3.5 3 and 2.5. The reviews seem to ask for additional experiments and clarifications regarding notation, but I do not see a place where this can be done. Could anyone please give me some advice on what I can do? Thanks!
Unlucky-Difficulty86 t1_izqsfpr wrote
Do reviewers really read our response and raise the score? I never did this before so just want some opinions
user_11235813 t1_izwag5y wrote
I think regarding experiments you can do easy ones or of they are larger promise to add them to the camera-ready version (if you think it is feasible). Regarding notation you could just clarify questions in the response form, right? This might hep for formatting, as it mentions that superscript/subscript is possible: https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165872/start-v2-softconf-what-markup-is-allowed-in-reviews
appadiyum_solalam t1_j0prnav wrote
Any idea when the final scores after rebuttal will be available? Will we come to know about it only when the final results are out?
ibraheemMmoosa t1_iz4iye3 wrote
Has the reviews come in yet?