xgu5 t1_iywg9ma wrote
Reply to comment by crouching_dragon_420 in [D] Score 4.5 GNN paper from Muhan Zhang at Peking University was amazingly accepted by NeurIPS 2022 by Even_Stay3387
If that’s the case, why do we even bother to have multiple anonymous reviewers? Just to let the AC make the decisions based on their “more senior” experience.
maybelator t1_iyycm4g wrote
Because they have 30+ papers to manage. The reviews allow them to focus on edge cases such as this one.
With CMT, the rebuttal is partially addressed to the AC. With openreview, I agree that it looks more uncomfortable.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments