ReginaldIII t1_iy5nmcv wrote
Reply to comment by sam__izdat in [P] Stable Diffusion 2.0 and the Importance of Negative Prompts for Good Results (+ Colab Notebooks + Negative Embedding) by minimaxir
I hate that I'm going to be "that guy" but it's not obvious enough that it's just a joke because it does actually produce reasonably similar results. "Improved" is, at least from this, somewhat plausible so I would be careful saying it because you don't actually mean it seriously but that isn't clear.
You'd have been dunking on them just as well if you'd said a bullshit random prompt performs comparatively.
sam__izdat t1_iy5nsm3 wrote
It wasn't my intention to deceive anyone. I thought it was pretty clear that this is humor and not serious research.
JanssonsFrestelse t1_iy73zgf wrote
Should have used the negative prompt "a bullshit random prompt that performs comparatively"
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments