Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

hadaev t1_ixn5o10 wrote

Reply to comment by my-sunrise in [P] Stable Diffusion 2.0 Announcement by hardmaru

"accuse of censorship" was about worst artists styles prompts.

And gived how some artists whined about model, some peoples on stable diffusion subbredit started conspiracy about due "legal issues they’re facing" they removed (censored) some artists from data and gave us lobotomized model.

Which probably doesnt happened to my opinion, gived they said they changed text encoder.

−5

sam__izdat t1_ixneldl wrote

> conspiracy about due "legal issues they’re facing"

No, they might be a bunch of mewling toddlers, but that's not a conspiracy theory. There was a lot of corporate and legislative pressure to remove objectionable content, so it appears they mostly removed human anatomy, weapons, certain contemporary artists, celebrity faces, etc. The problem with that, I expect, is that LAION's dataset is already just awful -- and you're cutting into some of the better data you have available.

11

hadaev t1_ixnh0ro wrote

>so it appears they mostly removed human anatomy, weapons, certain contemporary artists, celebrity faces, etc.

Ah, appears.

How many data samples you tested for this conclusion?

−3

sam__izdat t1_ixnhbrh wrote

I'm just going by what I've seen people try to produce and say, so far. I haven't done any extensive testing, partly because I'm using an ancient Tesla GPU and they broke FP32.

3

hadaev t1_ixnrhn4 wrote

Colab.

But yeah, usually such big models are tested on huge scales.

Some cherry picked comparisons with tens samples shows nothing.

1