Submitted by a1_jakesauce_ t3_z1nfma in MachineLearning
MPPDE from Brandstetter gets cited a lot. There’s also a lot of PINN, but I’m interested in supervised methods first
Submitted by a1_jakesauce_ t3_z1nfma in MachineLearning
MPPDE from Brandstetter gets cited a lot. There’s also a lot of PINN, but I’m interested in supervised methods first
Top-Avocado-2564 t1_ixcrq8m wrote
PiNN aren't really supervised or unsupervised so to speak. It's a misleading way to think about PiNN architecture
Neural pde solvers can be of three flavours - operator learning, graph pde and purely function approximator ( lagaris 2007 ) approach.
SOTA in pinns is a bit useless. Nobody cares if you can do burgers equation as fast as possible. Real life systems are coupled, mixture of pde/ ode , possibly stiff, it's a smorgasbord of challenges.
Fno works great in some situations but it has limitations in handling stochastic multiscale systems - think high RANS
When it comes to PiNN ymmv