Submitted by dasayan05 t3_ymctqy in MachineLearning
tfburns t1_iv3no12 wrote
Reply to comment by Blasphemer666 in [D] ICLR 2023 reviews are out. How was your experience ? by dasayan05
>How should I read the reviews?
I suggest reading them in full multiple times, then trying to write a synthesis of the opinions and main critiques. After that, you need to figure out how will you respond to the main critiques: will you try to fix them (if so, how?) or are those critiques incorrect or mistaken in some way (if so, how?).
​
>So how good is accepted?
No one can tell you for sure at this stage, and ultimately it's a case-by-case decision. However, you can see what past years' scores led to in terms of decisions here:
Blasphemer666 t1_iv3o284 wrote
Thanks a lot for sharing extremely useful information. 🥹
tfburns t1_iv3o7ln wrote
You're welcome and good luck :)
Blasphemer666 t1_iv3oenu wrote
So will those posters also be included in the proceedings?
tfburns t1_iv3on4g wrote
Yes.
Edit: I don't believe the image of the poster itself is included, but rather the paper!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments