farmingvillein t1_iv1x778 wrote
Reply to comment by Takahashi_Raya in [N] Class-action lawsuit filed against GitHub, Microsoft, and OpenAI regarding the legality of GitHub Copilot, an AI-using tool for programmers by Wiskkey
> It hasn't that is why ghetty has blocked ai
You are right that OP is wrong (re:whether this is a settled legal issue)...but let's not pretend that ghetty [sic] doing so has to do with anything than attempted revenue maximization on their part.
Successful, prolific AI art devalues their portfolio of images, and they know that.
Takahashi_Raya t1_iv20ewh wrote
I mean that is very much part of it but it is indeed not the only reason ghetty did that.
farmingvillein t1_iv29u6c wrote
Getty and Shutterstock literally turned around and partnered with generative AI companies--who do exactly what you flag as a problem--to sell images on their platforms.
Takahashi_Raya t1_iv2c6qi wrote
Getty and shutterstock partnered with OpenAI (creators of Dall-E) and with BRIA. Both company's who's training data has been confirmed to be ethically sourced and only contain public DOMAIN images and images they have licenses too.
the ones who are under scrutiny from community's are Midjourney, stablediffusion & novelAI. when it comes to image gen due to them not adhering to the ethics in AI data usage.
OpenAI is mentioned in the current main topic of Co-Pilot as well due to microsoft using their codex model as part of co-pilot but that doesn't change that Dall-E is ethically used.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments