Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Inevitable-Ad8503 t1_iuth7a3 wrote

Nice. Thanks for taking the time to implement and to share. I get the feeling that this approach will be way more coherent for certain types of content and layout (mayhaps when prompting something like “a tiger and a bunny sitting side by side” and the “traditional” (is it old enough to have traditions yet?) approach will be better for other types, perhaps such as “a tiger and a bunny”, where the intent is what that approach often results in, some interpolation between the two objects; a chimera or mutant.

Or maybe another way to explain is that this MagixMix is akin to orchestration of multiple parts, and the present approach is more akin to a mashup of multiple parts; each has its own strengths and appropriate applications.

9

cloneofsimo OP t1_iutiw0k wrote

Indeed, there are so many natural methods to interpolate concepts, and I agree 100% that there some are better than others at certain tasks.
Compared to famous Img2Img, I understood this as a "generalized" method to interpolate. Since if you take \mu = 1.0, this becomes just Img2Img interpolation. You can read the paper to see the effect of \mu on interpolation, and it's quite interesting. Since this is more general approach, there are more things to tweak and figure out I guess...?

1