Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

yubozhao t1_iu6huvq wrote

Hello. I am the founder of BentoML. We are working on integration with triton and other high-performance serving runtime solutions.

−5

big_dog_2k OP t1_iu6yjf3 wrote

Hi! Can you give the elevator pitch for Bento? When should I use it and for what part of my model serving problems will it solve? If you integrate with another serving solution - how much more complexity is that going to add and how are you thinking about deployment?

4

braintampon t1_iu9n6k7 wrote

Why is this dude downvoted

1

yubozhao t1_iu9qzm3 wrote

I guess others see this is spammy or ads? Honestly I disclosure who I am and didn’t try to sell (from my pov). I guess that’s not welcomed in this sub. shrug.jpg

Edit: typo

3

braintampon t1_iua3jkt wrote

Hahah i mean your answer is quite pertinent to OPs post and also i dont see how selling is wrong lmao

But being the founder of BentoML what is your answer to OPs question tho? Which is the fastest, most dev friendly model serving framework acc to you? Which model serving framework in your opinion is the biggest threat (competitor) to BentoML? Is there some benchmarking you guys have done that indicates some potential inferencing speed ups?

My organisation uses BentoML and I personally love what yall have done w it btw. Would be awesome to get your honest opinion on OPs question

TIA!

1

big_dog_2k OP t1_iua8imm wrote

Great! Exactly this, I just want someone to provide feedback. Do you see throughout improvements using bento with dynamic batching vs without? Is the throughout good in general or is the biggest benefit ease of use?

2

programmerChilli t1_iufqn15 wrote

Well, you disclosed who you are, but that's pretty much all you did :P

The OP asked a number of questions, and you didn't really answer any of them. You didn't explain what BentoML can offer, you didn't explain how it can speed up inference, you didn't really even explain what BentoML is.

Folks will tolerate "advertising" if it comes in the form of interesting technical content. However, you basically just mentioned your company and provided no technical content, so it's just pure negative value from most people's perspective.

1

yubozhao t1_iufs7wp wrote

Fair enough. I will probably get to it. I don’t know about you. I need to “charge up” and make sure my answer is good. That takes time and it was the Halloween weeks after all.

1