Submitted by Mogady t3_y7708w in MachineLearning
suricatasuricata t1_istl32a wrote
> I only allowed to navigate the docs but not StackOverflow or google search, I thought this should be about showing my abilities to understand the problem, the given data and process it as much as I can and get a good result fastly.
To me this is a sign that they are overfitting to a specific type of candidate. And simply put, their interview process is not robust. If the underlying intent is to find a candidate who has deeper insight into their tools, as opposed to what can be gained via copy pasting blocks of code, you can probe that super easily without this contrived approach. Ask them about how their tools work, contrasting one option versus the other and so on.
IMO, you shouldn't overfit to this experience either. I mean, if we allow for the possibility that an Engineer can be incompetent/crappy, we should allow for the possibility that a Manager (prepared to bet that the hiring manager probably has the same ~ 4 years or so of experience managing) can also be below average.
emerging-tech-reader t1_iswhsrm wrote
> To me this is a sign that they are overfitting to a specific type of candidate.
In banking/finance jobs it is quite common to not even have access beyond what is supplied internally as documentation.
This is what that suggests to me.
suricatasuricata t1_iswjri1 wrote
Are such jobs remote? I have worked previously in defense gigs where you are forced to work on computers that are air gapped. Seems to me that entire setup relies on being present physically.
emerging-tech-reader t1_iswmsm0 wrote
True. I skimmed over that. Cancels out my assumption.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments