great news, how much would it cost to train

yes

very many and very much

[deleted]

I'm excited for open source code generation models. So I won't have to pay Github every month. And if this is a bigger dataset and permissively licensed, this means there will be no chance that it will generate copyrighted code.

I'm curious which 'permissive' licenses have terms permitting the use of the code as training data in machine learning algorithms. Are we assuming licenses which allow code to be modified/redistributed, also include this right?

What if a commercial for-profit company trains on a lot of copyleft code, then commercialises the result and refuses to release the model? Is that ethical?

> What if a commercial for-profit company trains on a lot of copyleft code, then commercialises the result and refuses to release the model? Is that ethical?

I would assume this is the same as licences which allow to use the code to commercialise software when using it

impressive, bash automation, here I come

Permissive licenses basically allow the user to do anything they want with the code save sue the author.

>What if a commercial for-profit company trains on a lot of copyleft code, then commercialises the result and refuses to release the model?

That probably isn't legal, but copyleft licenses are not permission licenses and are not included in this dataset for that reason.

[removed]

If you have to ask :D

As an open-source code writer this feels like an abuse of my contributions, they are monetizing on my code, building a brand out of other people's content, and cash big time with a Stock IPO in the near future.

In order to take back control I decided to change my naive flower-power-every-body-happy MIT license projects to the more protective GPL3