Submitted by [deleted] t3_11yccp8 in MachineLearning
SupplyChainPhd t1_jd74jyc wrote
Looked fine at first glance, imo. I know nothing about medicine, but it’s nice to see that each of the models evaluated were upper 90% on accuracy.
I would want to see how the model performs on a much larger data set before trusting the validity.
WildConsideration783 t1_jd77ri3 wrote
It sounds too good to be true.
memberjan6 t1_jd7ubar wrote
A dumb model gets 99% acc on 1% prevalence of disease, easily and correctly.
Be careful what you ask for, like acc not f1
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments