Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

truchisoft t1_je05j63 wrote

The funny thing about these posts is that this is clearly propaganda aimed to low effort people.

Anyone caring about this is either blinded by their own prejudice or just too dumb to even try GPT once themselves.

Everyone else does not need someone telling them that even GPT3.5 is incredible for coding (and a lot of other stuff), it is not perfect but it goes a long way, heck, I was even able to make a simple game in less than 3 hours using 99% GPT3.5 code and DALL-E sprites.

−10

austacious t1_je0g6oi wrote

A healthy skepticism in AIML from those in the field is incredibly important and relatively hard to come by. Having the attitude that 'This is great and everything is wonderful' does not lead to meaningful progress addressing very real issues. It's very productive to point out shortcomings of otherwise highly effective models.

12

truchisoft t1_je0un8g wrote

Oh no no, not my argument here, but the whole title wording looks like a sleazy attack, this is not criticism but seems like a hit piece, since like other commenters mention, other independent tests were ran on GPT4 already and people is already using GPT4 for coding.

0

st8ic t1_je0lxgn wrote

"bro it's great trust me" isn't exactly a scientific way to think about these issues.

9

visarga t1_je0zqxm wrote

ML people spend all day thinking about model limitations and errors, it's only normal that we are not so easily swayed by a non-peer reviewed paper declaring first contact with AGI. Especially from MS who owns 50% of OpenAI

6

truchisoft t1_je1huuz wrote

Point taken, this article tho is also filled with holes tho.

0