Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

E_Snap t1_jcd16ks wrote

Reply to comment by suflaj in [Discussion] What happened to r/NaturalLanguageProcessing ? by MadNietzsche

I’ve been using ChatGPT to write all of my sales emails for difficult clients lately, and it has been fantastic. It took what should have been another staffmember at my company and made it into a proofreading duty I can handle while working on other things.

Also… hate to say it, but the fact that you’re using the words “humiliated” and “jailbroken” in this context doesn’t exactly cast a very good light on your understanding of the situation.

9

suflaj t1_jcd4131 wrote

> I’ve been using ChatGPT to write all of my sales emails for difficult clients lately, and it has been fantastic. It took what should have been another staffmember at my company and made it into a proofreading duty I can handle while working on other things.

I fail to see the point you're making.

> Also… hate to say it, but the fact that you’re using the words “humiliated” and “jailbroken” in this context doesn’t exactly cast a very good light on your understanding of the situation.

I also fail to see what you're saying. How else would you describe events in which you show how stupid ChatGPT actually is and those where you get to trick it to bypass all security filters?

−8

Eggy-Toast t1_jcdgpig wrote

GPT-4 would understand the point he’s making

“The point being made here is twofold:

The user is praising ChatGPT for its effectiveness in writing sales emails for difficult clients, highlighting how it has streamlined their workload by replacing the need for an additional staff member and allowing them to multitask.

The user is also critiquing the choice of words used by someone else ("humiliated" and "jailbroken") in the given context, suggesting that the person may not have a proper understanding of the situation.

The logical conclusion drawn from these points is that ChatGPT is a valuable tool that can significantly improve efficiency in handling tasks like sales emails, while also implying that it is important to use appropriate terminology and demonstrate a clear understanding of a situation when discussing or debating any issue.”

L+ratio+maidenless

7

suflaj t1_jcevhag wrote

I understand what the user is saying, I do not understand how it relates to anything said before that.

Sadly, while GPT4 may be able to predict the next token based on studying the language's syntax thoroughly, it still fails to actually understand anything. Unless the original commenter is a bot, I would expect them to explain how what they said has anything to do with my comment, or the claims made about NLP researcher's obsolescence due to its release.

−2

DesertBoxing t1_jcf5st4 wrote

What you don’t understand is it took 2 yrs to go from nothing to gpt-4. Do you understand how unbelievably fast that is? A tsunami of money is about to pour into this industry!

4

suflaj t1_jcfbkxq wrote

It took more than 6 years from zero, because to reach GPT4 you had to develop transformers and all the GPTs before 4... The actual difference between ChatGPT and GPT4 is apparently in the data and some policies that regulate when it is allowed to answer (which are still incomplete). This is not remarkable.

I AGAIN fail to see how this relates to previous comments.

0