MysteryInc152 t1_jca93qy wrote
I don't think patent battles will go anywhere. DeepMind could simply stop releasing papers (or curtail it significantly) like they've already hinted they might do.
VelveteenAmbush t1_jcbw6mx wrote
DeepMind's leaders would love to hoard their secrets. The reason they don't is that it would make them a dead end for the careers of their research scientists -- because aside from the occasional public spectacle (AlphaGo vs. Lee Sedol) nothing would ever see the light of day. If they stopped publishing, they'd hemorrhage talent and die.
OpenAI doesn't have this dilemma because they actually commercialize their cutting-edge research. Commercializing its research makes its capabilities apparent to everyone, and being involved in its creation advances your career even without a paper on Arxiv.
sobe86 t1_jccmvfj wrote
This is hearsay, but my understanding was that Hassabis' goal was for Deepmind to be winning one Nobel Prize per year or something like this, so I don't think he's personally up for the closed research model.
VelveteenAmbush t1_jcd6bkq wrote
I think Hassabis' goal is to build a synthetic god and reshape the cosmos, and open research isn't necessary conducive to that except as needed to keep researchers motivated and engaged.
MysteryInc152 t1_jcbwooc wrote
I agree there's a limit to how much they can withhold without releasing anything at all.
Hyper1on t1_jck7qjx wrote
DM already does hoard their secrets, there are successful projects there which are not published. What they show you is what they decide needs to be public to get good PR.
NoScallion2450 t1_jca9r94 wrote
maybe but what about this? https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/18/apple-paid-5-billion-to-6-billion-to-settle-with-qualcomm-ubs.html
BeautyInUgly t1_jcb88b2 wrote
peanuts compared to a patent war between Google / MSFT
oathbreakerkeeper t1_jcee0rj wrote
Where/when did they hint that?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments