Submitted by zy415 t3_11ylumz in MachineLearning
ILOVETOCONBANDITS t1_je3m9ts wrote
Reply to comment by OkWrongdoer4091 in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
I had a total of 4 revieiwers. Went from (6, 6, 4, 3) to (6, 6, 5, 6). The first two reviewers didn't respond at all.
OkWrongdoer4091 t1_je3vscq wrote
My only hope that my metareviewers will be diligent enough to reach out to the reviewers that didn't respond and ask if they'd changed their mind after reading the rebuttals. Not responding to the rebuttals destroys the purpose of rebuttal (and the review itself). If you volunteer to serve the community as a reviewer, why not commit to doing a good job of it? I wish I could contact the ACs, but the buttons are no longer available on OpenReview.
ILOVETOCONBANDITS t1_je3yo38 wrote
Yeah i feel your pain. it's a bit weird that even though a 5 this year is technically borderline accept, its basically a reject given the score distributions. And not getting a good rebuttal hurts.
OkWrongdoer4091 t1_je3w01r wrote
Was it accepted in the end?
ILOVETOCONBANDITS t1_je3w70l wrote
Er we'll see soon? I guess decisions come out in april
OkWrongdoer4091 t1_je3wd2a wrote
Ah. Sorry, I forgot we're talking about this year 😄. So three more agonizing weeks to go.
ILOVETOCONBANDITS t1_je3wltt wrote
haha no worries. I hope with an average of 5.75 there is a decent shot of acceptance
OkWrongdoer4091 t1_je3zc8k wrote
Good luck 🤞
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments