Submitted by zy415 t3_11ylumz in MachineLearning
zy415 OP t1_jdfhjy4 wrote
Reply to comment by zhaoyl18 in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
Agreed. It’s basically a joke
sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdfmdtt wrote
Finally got a response saying that you’re rebuttal adequately addressed my concerns. (Yet no change in the rating) 🥲 why do people do this?
zy415 OP t1_jdfzxh3 wrote
Sigh, that must be frustrating. What score did the reviewer give?
sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdg0u7p wrote
It was a 6, and we were really hopeful that it can bump to 7
paulgavrikov t1_jdgz9be wrote
Adress this! Ask them why they did not increase their score if all concerns were addressed.
sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdi6hot wrote
We’ve written a gentle note, but no reply to that. Literally ran 50 new experiments as suggested
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments