Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

zhaoyl18 t1_jdf9tvo wrote

Reply to comment by sleeplessinseattle00 in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415

same. None reaction from any reviewer. In this case the 'discussion period' is vague and pretty funny

2

zy415 OP t1_jdfhjy4 wrote

Agreed. It’s basically a joke

3

sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdfmdtt wrote

Finally got a response saying that you’re rebuttal adequately addressed my concerns. (Yet no change in the rating) 🥲 why do people do this?

3

zy415 OP t1_jdfzxh3 wrote

Sigh, that must be frustrating. What score did the reviewer give?

2

sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdg0u7p wrote

It was a 6, and we were really hopeful that it can bump to 7

1

paulgavrikov t1_jdgz9be wrote

Adress this! Ask them why they did not increase their score if all concerns were addressed.

2

sleeplessinseattle00 t1_jdi6hot wrote

We’ve written a gentle note, but no reply to that. Literally ran 50 new experiments as suggested

1