Submitted by redlow0992 t3_11r97fn in MachineLearning
respeckKnuckles t1_jc8xver wrote
"Not using gpt4" is going to be in all NLP conference paper reviews for the next six months.
YouAgainShmidhoobuh t1_jc9a44k wrote
Not so sure about this. It seems like a tempting argument but gpt4 has no explanation of model architecture or training approach at all, so there is no way for fair comparison of any kind.
bearific t1_jc9jo5y wrote
Yet when my sister submitted a paper before ChatGPT was released, she got complaints that she did not evaluate on ChatGPT literally days after it was released
ClassicJewJokes t1_jc9q98x wrote
Doesn't matter to most reviewers. Little care for accessibility as well, remember the flak you'd get for not using MuJoCo in a RL paper when it wasn't opensource.
respeckKnuckles t1_jca9td9 wrote
Have you never been peer reviewed before?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments