v_krishna t1_jc7wzmx wrote
Reply to comment by PriestOfFern in [R] Stanford-Alpaca 7B model (an instruction tuned version of LLaMA) performs as well as text-davinci-003 by dojoteef
I don't doubt it. I've only been using it for workflow aids (copilot style stuff, and using it to generate unit tests to capture error handling conditions etc), and now we are piloting first generative text products but very human in the loop (customer data used to feed into a prompt but the output then feeds into an editor for a human being to proof and update before doing something with it). The amount of totally fake webinars hosted by totally fake people it has hallucinated is wild (the content and agendas and such sound great and are sensible but none of it exists!)
mattrobs t1_jcs3vvo wrote
Have you tried GPT4? It’s been quite resilient in my testing
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments