Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cyvr_com t1_jc32sel wrote

Reply to comment by Bulky_Highlight_3352 in [R] Stanford-Alpaca 7B model (an instruction tuned version of LLaMA) performs as well as text-davinci-003 by dojoteef

Llama changed their license this morning

−9

RabbitContrarian t1_jc34fjp wrote

They did not. Some random person is asking Meta to change it.

13

Atupis t1_jc35ppl wrote

Meta should do it it would seriously affect the Microsoft-OpenAI thing and might also hurt Google down the line.

3

currentscurrents t1_jc39i38 wrote

Yeah, but I bet they intend to make money from it somehow. Likely by selling API access and integrating it into their products.

The metaverse would be considerably less stupid if it had language model-powered NPCs to talk to and 3D NeRFs to walk around in.

12

Taenk t1_jc33k5h wrote

Can you please link a source?

2

LetterRip t1_jc3864s wrote

Source code and weights are different licenses.

LLama license in the request form appears to be the same,

Relevant part here

> a. Subject to your compliance with the Documentation and Sections 2, 3, and 5, Meta grants you a non-exclusive, worldwide, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, revocable, royalty free and limited license under Meta’s copyright interests to reproduce, distribute, and create derivative works of the Software solely for your non-commercial research purposes. The foregoing license is personal to you, and you may not assign or sublicense this License or any other rights or obligations under this License without Meta’s prior written consent; any such assignment or sublicense will be void and will automatically and immediately terminate this License.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfqNECQnMkycAp2jP4Z9TFX0cGR4uf7b_fBxjY_OjhJILlKGA/viewform

as linked from

https://github.com/facebookresearch/llama

2