Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

OtherBluesBrother t1_jeff3k7 wrote

If Trump could read he would be very upset with this joke.

14

MakesMyHeadHurt t1_jefrrx6 wrote

It's okay, according to him he was only "indicated".

4

Mister_Peepers t1_jeerxyv wrote

Please treat this post as if it was very inflammatory.

2

RealTheDonaldTrump t1_jef1hg5 wrote

That’s brilliant. Do you think I can get my lawyer to convince a judge that I am incompetent?

2

Ishidan01 t1_jefnv7b wrote

The real trick is to be declared incompetent to be held responsible for past actions in a court of law and simultaneously be declared as the most competent person to be the future leader of the free world in the halls of Congress.

0

jenejes t1_jefpv7j wrote

..the jury is still out on that

1

dmetz1979 t1_jeg8hq7 wrote

I heard there was evidence that proves his innocence that the DA totally overlooked. Even a statement from the porn star that said it never happened. The sexual encounter or the hush money she said never happened .

−2

ApocalypseSpokesman t1_jegn7y4 wrote

Ideally, whatever the truth is, it would come to light in the trial.

However, I have no confidence that will actually happen for this or any other high-profile case.

3

Freethecrafts t1_jeh3wlu wrote

It’d be a shame if he took her to mediation to prove it happened.

1

RevealSpare8167 t1_jeevuxt wrote

The real question is who will his supporters go after and for what. Who knows what secrets are being held back and saved for a special occasion. This is only the beginning of political vendettas unleashed. I’m fairly confident there are Republican DAs with grand juries on deck. Anyway, decent joke.

−10

Interesting_Reply584 t1_jefj97m wrote

Isn't he being indicted for his deal with Stormy Daniels? It wasn't really a secret being held back.

0

hsvsunshyn t1_jefz4w7 wrote

No, he is being indicted for misusing business funds and other finance violations (including a claim that the money to reimburse Cohen for the deal with Daniels was "legal fees" to Cohen, rather than stating that it was for payment to Daniels). There is also a question about the money possibly coming from his campaign funds, which would be a further violation.

If Trump were to have cut a personal check from his own finances to Daniels, then I do not think anyone could call that illegal. It is the source of the funds and how they were transferred that is the problem (from what I understand), along with any coverup.

I might be missing something (especially with "more than 30 counts"), but that is my understanding.

2

biosaw1 t1_jeec1c7 wrote

No the question is how far will the democrats go to keep aTrump out of office???? Great job on our boarder by the way dems.

−37

Careless_Raisin_1724 t1_jef9mog wrote

He’s done a brilliant job of keeping himself out of office, the democrats don’t have to do anything

3

Punkeewalla t1_jeex3au wrote

Hard truths for the lefties to swallow.

−16

sarcasticpremed OP t1_jefvaku wrote

Hard truths are simply hard to swallow. That’s why your mother couldn’t swallow you when she was told having a child runs the risk of the child being an absolute moron.

0

[deleted] t1_jefvyap wrote

[removed]

−2

sarcasticpremed OP t1_jefzd36 wrote

Ah yes. Promoting violence. Good job representing why conservatives have much room for improvement.

−3

Punkeewalla t1_jeg05cz wrote

Aren't you the punk that insulted my mother? Shut your cckscker, sock wad. Perfect name for you.

−1

sarcasticpremed OP t1_jeg2wgb wrote

No. I insulted you. Your reading comprehension is about the level I expect from a conservative. Rather than try to come up with a clever roast of your own, you say I should get shot; your intelligence is actually worse than I expect from a conservative.

6

Punkeewalla t1_jeg3exb wrote

Promoting violence? Shot on a rock refers to ejaculating on a stone. About the level of comprehension I would expect from Sock Wad.

2