Submitted by bloomberglaw t3_108g6zt in IAmA
asianinindia t1_j3s3cmv wrote
Is there a chance the FDA will ever be taken to task on their lack of regulation?
bloomberglaw OP t1_j3s5qgc wrote
Great question. Heavy metals in baby foods is an issue that has existed for some time. But as former FDA associate commissioner for foods David Acheson told us in an interview, the FDA's response to heavy metals has been one of "putting out fires" rather than implementing a "fundamental strategic plan.”
Lawmakers have put pressure on FDA to address this, and as Congress looked into heavy metals in baby food in 2021, the FDA started its new program Closer to Zero program aiming to set standards and lower concentrations of lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury.
It's likely we will see continued pressure on the FDA on this. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) told us he plans to introduce a bill again this Congress, called the Baby Food Safety Act. The legislation would limit the levels of inorganic arsenic to between 10 and 15 ppb, cadmium and lead to between 5 and 10 ppb and mercury to 2 ppb — a more stringent standard for all baby foods than Closer to Zero’s guidance on juices.
--Celine Castronuovo
asianinindia t1_j3tw7ql wrote
That's good to hear. Even if it will take time. I wonder how adult food is now. And about standards in other countries.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments