scepticalbob t1_izyfszl wrote
Reply to comment by The_Law_of_Pizza in I’m Cornelius Hurley, academic, lawyer, 14-year director of a Federal Home Loan Bank. Ask me anything about the FHLBs. by ProfBU
I’m going to jump in here
the FHFA and other housing specific agencies can’t do much to address affordable housing, baring them instituting some form of subsidized program that permanently buys down mortgage interest rates. And there isn’t much of an appetite for that
Where the fed is screwing up, and what needs to be done
Right now inflation is being tackled by trying to dramatically curb demand by raising rates, which simultaneously increases housing costs and affordability.
The problem is, there is a massive housing shortage, so this process only really pushes out the individuals who are already on the fringes. In other words, it’s making it worse
What needs to be done, are federal and state level policies that stimulate supply
These should include tax incentives (both positive and negative incentives) for individuals and companies to sell Non Owner Occupied homes
Tax incentives to home owners to sell to Owner Occupants vs Investors
Tax incentives to stimulate new construction
Streamline permitting for new construction
Source : 30 years in the mortgage industry
TerryScarchuk t1_izyq1j5 wrote
To add to that, while incentivizing supply increases we should also look to protect the developers from another future crash. Last time around tens of thousands of small to medium sized builders were financially ruined and left the industry entirely because they were left holding the bag on entirely too much inventory. That’s a big part of why the houses we need today don’t exist and likely won’t be built for another 5-10 years. I’m not saying a “too big to fail” type bailout, but a federal housing insurance program that builders can buy into and have a rescue net to sell inventory into. This could help create a diverse section 8 housing pool while keeping builders afloat.
scepticalbob t1_izyqm95 wrote
Your comments are accurate, but new construction numbers are well below where they were in 2008, and overall percentage of home ownership is waaaay below 08
TerryScarchuk t1_j056v7a wrote
Right, but the reason for NC numbers being so low is that so many builders are out of the industry, and those that remain are hesitant to break new starts. That trend has existed for over a decade.
vAltyR47 t1_izz0ipa wrote
I think the most elegant way to achieve this is to simply shift the current property tax to fall on land value, rather than land value + building value. That way, people's tax bills don't go up when they improve their house or build on their land. Most people who actually live on that land would see an overall decrease in tax bills because most of their property value (the building) no longer gets taxed, but empty lots and lots with condemned or run-down buildings see their bill go up significantly, forcing them to sell to someone who's actually going to do something with the property.
Combine this with zoning and permitting reform to lower construction costs, and I think that will help the situation a lot.
theInferno t1_j00ekpi wrote
Property taxes are too localized and State ran. This needs to be a federal solution.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments