bornonthetide t1_ittj80z wrote
Why were wifi networks found on so many machines that were intended to not that have feature on them.
Also don't you consider dominion to be an ominous name for a voting machine? Also they have been used in countries we know are subject fraud and their results seem suspicious. Also did you see the film 200 mules.
Natanael_L t1_ittz85o wrote
The mules film was debunked in full before it was published.
Why does the name matter?
The wifi thing is a process issue. Local staff messed up. And in other countries they don't even need to mess with machines. If you control the whole thing with no insight and no audits you can just lie about the result regardless how the vote happens.
With paper backups AND independent audits none of that is a problem because the real count can be verified by hand, it would be obvious if it differs from what the machine reports. In western countries there's enough insight into how the voting is run to detect attempts at manipulation.
bornonthetide t1_itv5oxd wrote
To people who have training in secret societies, we have learned they must announce their intentions, it can be sarcastic, hidden in placmne sight or whatnot. being true spiritual rule or not, it's some kinda of spiritual rule to them.
I watched the film, Dinesh also has a spirituality that prevents him from telling an intentional lie.
Natanael_L t1_itv9owu wrote
The dude has fraud convictions. That's absolutely laughable.
bornonthetide t1_itvbzhj wrote
Are you referring to the time he was jailed over donating 10k to his friends campaign? In the history of thr united states, he is the only prosecution of campaign donation being over limit.
Like no arguing, just adult conversation, but when you hear that he's the only person to ever to be punished for it, why doesn't that give a you pause and wonder why the DNC would want to punish him in the form of a 2 teered justice system?
Natanael_L t1_itvdk7h wrote
My response is to go ahead and prosecute more people over it. Don't let people get away with crime. The people who's prosecutions you're upset over all broke the law.
bornonthetide t1_itvzb35 wrote
Well, why was only person who made an anti Obama film the one who got in trouble? And campaign finance? You want people to all goto jail for campaign finance issues of 10k dollar donations? 5k over? That's what you want?
Natanael_L t1_itw7xsk wrote
Most people don't leave evidence but he did.
Nobody accidentally goes over the limit by that much.
bornonthetide t1_itw8pvv wrote
You're telling me that no one ever donates 10k by check? That's the only thing he did. You're delusional in this aspect, it's such a clear cut case of target behavior your comments are making me sick.
Natanael_L t1_itwf6fr wrote
You're really far down the rabbit hole. I told you everybody who breaks the law should face consequences and you falsely take it as proof that I somehow am the tribalistic hypocrite and not you yourself.
bornonthetide t1_itwg9cz wrote
My point is that there's have been MILLIONS of donations over the limit, of those IRS audits happened to some of those... not one single one got in trouble. The justice system was weponised intbis case and I don't know how any reasonable person can't see that.
Natanael_L t1_itx3j26 wrote
If you think it's weaponized in every single instance where a criminal in the republican party gets caught then you need to reevaluate your life choices. Do you really think Republicans are overrepresented in prosecutions? They aren't.
bornonthetide t1_itx6dn4 wrote
I'm saying and only saying there's a million examples of this law being broke, and one example of someone being prosecuted for it. And the one guy that did it, made a movie that was counter Obama. Injustice of this nature should make all our blood boil.
Natanael_L t1_itx703j wrote
Didn't I already tell you I'm all for prosecuting the rest too?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments