mhornberger t1_j7t1jvc wrote
Reply to comment by Consensuseur in What's your estimation for the minimum size of global population required for preserving modern civilization with advanced technology and medicine, and even progressing further? by Evgeneey
I don't know what "limitless growth" means, honestly. Growth in what? You can have economic growth with a plateaued or even declining population. We were never going to have infinite people, infinite energy use, infinite land use, infinite food consumption, whatever.
I don't think people are going to embrace austerity voluntarily. Emissions are already declining in many rich countries, anyway. India, China etc remaining poor was never going to be our plan. Nor are Americans or Europeans going to want to live like a poor person in India in 1980. People like wealth. Comfort, convenience, status goods, travel, a varied diet, etc.
Consensuseur t1_j7t2a6b wrote
Well, hopefully our population can plateau and our consumption can be achieved with less consequence sooner rather than later.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments