Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

U17sses t1_j4xyrjl wrote

no not yet, but I wouldn’t say never ppl can be quite pessimistic in that sense. no one denies that entanglement can “communicate” FTL but it’s the fact that no information can possibly be gleaned from entangled particles changing states because it’s random and cannot be meaningfully observed and assembled into coherent information, yet.

3

warplants t1_j4ycoh2 wrote

> no one denies that entanglement can “communicate” FTL

Wrong, plenty of physicists will deny this. Only certain interpretations of quantum mechanics rely on an FTL “wave function collapse” (namely, the Copenhagen interpretation, which at best is an incomplete description of reality, but more likely is just flat wrong.)

3

U17sses t1_j4yeqaw wrote

Yeah sorry I was busy when I wrote that, it’s more of a state of being that’s why I put communicate in quotes bc it’s not rly communicating it’s more just “being” that state.

1

DoktoroKiu t1_j5155ha wrote

>cannot be meaningfully observed and assembled into coherent information, yet.

And hopefully it never will be. Violations of causality would not be fun.

0