Submitted by Gari_305 t3_10f7wzy in Futurology
Gari_305 OP t1_j4vi31w wrote
Reply to comment by LiCHtsLiCH in Energy Teleportation and Negative Energy Observed in Quantum Research Breakthrough by Gari_305
>From the paper
>
>While it is fairly widely known that information about
>
>quantum states can be transported to remote locations [1–4], it is less well known that quantum state energy can be similarly transmitted, despite its impact
>
>and potential for future applications. Quantum information transferred by quantum teleportation is not a physical quantity, but energy is a distinct physical quantity. Transferring physical quantities to remote locations is an
>
>unexplored area of technology. Quantum Energy Teleportation (QET) was proposed by Hotta about 15 years ago and has been studied theoretically for spin chains [5– 7], an ion trap system [8], a quantum Hall system [9], and
>
>other various theoretical systems [10, 11]. It is surprising
>
>that (to the best of knowledge of the author) QET has
>
>never been confirmed by any experiment on any system
>
>before, even though it can be achieved with a very simple
>
>quantum system. The purpose of this paper is to make
>
>the first experimental realization of QET in actual quantum hardware and to establish the quantum circuits that
>
>make it possible. We achieved the realization of QET using some IBM quantum computers by applying quantum
>
>error mitigation [12–14]. The methods we have established can be applied to any system capable of QET.
>
>In what follows, we explain that QET is a universal
>
>means of quantum energy transfer, just as quantum teleportation is a universal means of quantum information
>
>transfer.
That statement right there u/LiCHtsLiCH is the linchpin. in which they're not talking about the transfer of quantum information as you stated is common but of quantum energy based on the first two paragraphs on the paper is a physical element.
LiCHtsLiCH t1_j4vrgnm wrote
Not aware of functional "Quantum" computers that use Qbits, instead of Si gates. So I have doubts IBM (or anyone) has one. There has been ZERO discussion relating to a programming language that can interact with that kind of processor. As far as Quantum as a whole, such as entanglement across distance in some sort of physics subspace sounds hilarious to me. The premise of Quantum as a science is that there are sub atomic paricles with varing rotations and orientations that effectively have 3 states of existence, and two of them we can't see or interact with. This is akin on some level to me, of 2/3 of my body not existing every once in a while based on un intentional change. Imagine getting accidently entageled with a star, a black hole or any celestial body, on accident, the results would be catastrophic. Ahkam's Razor, if we can do it on purpose, then it could happen accidentally, like climate change. People dont lose 2/3 of their mass periodically, nor have entageled on accident (get your head out of the gutter). Thanks for the break down on the article, I learned a while not to click on links i dont know, so I'm a bit hesitant. Lastly thanks for replying, I found this material super interesting, but could come up with easier methods of achieving the same behavior. A good read is a wiki on what started the pursuit of Quantum, something about a solar experiment in space that collected 1/3 as many nutrinos as expected, the obvious conclusion 2/3 were phasing in and out of existence?
ML4Bratwurst t1_j4w2bsx wrote
Q is a Quantum Programming Language by Microsoft. Somehow you are really throwing me off. You apparently have researched a lot of scientific information, but you use it like an idiot
LiCHtsLiCH t1_j4wj4dj wrote
Oof, however Q isn't a quantum computer language, according to Microsoft...
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/overview-what-is-qsharp-and-qdk
It is aparantly a Azure service using normal computers called quantum. Dunno. Thanks for the heads up.
ML4Bratwurst t1_j4x28vb wrote
Oof ... Yeah it's simulating q bits because quantum computers aren't broadly available yet. You can transfer Q to real quantum computers.......
LiCHtsLiCH t1_j4x3qu0 wrote
If I was reading that correctly, it has nothing to do with Quantum computers. It appears to be Azure (machine learning suite) applied to multiple computers to self assess machine learning gains, this is right up IBM's alley.
Lastly I'm not wasting it, but its not exactly coffee table topic.
Initial_Refuse2042 t1_j5hdls0 wrote
We need more people like you :) you should watch Sabine on Youtube if you don't already. The people in here will only try and force their religious views on you, they aren't as scientific as they think lol they should also watch a Youtube video on how microchips are made. I don't even think these people have heard of the quantum winter as there is no mention of it at all, so I would take their views as a grain of salt if you haven't already :)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments