joelmole79 t1_j6l58hl wrote on January 31, 2023 at 2:27 AM

Reply to comment by dangler001 in I think the future of movies/tv is AI generation. Explanation in comments by dangler001

Re: I don’t understand this comment:

I think it will turn people off and not work well for many genres. I wouldn’t assume this idea, even if feasible, would work as well for any type of movie under the sun. So if possible, it will be tried with varying success. It’s great for movies that are trying to make a commentary about AI and there are quite a few. It’s been tried in some limited ways for action and Sci-Fi movies. But I wouldn’t expect, for example, to see Laura Linney replaced in Ozark, or Ana De Armas in Blonde. What’s the point? We watch these things to see real humans doing things that people do. Dramatic performances - in the absence of a real person, what’s the fucking point? I would lose interest.

dangler001 OP t1_j6l7879 wrote on January 31, 2023 at 2:42 AM

thanks for the clarification

>Dramatic performances - in the absence of a real person, what’s the fucking point? I would lose interest.

There are plenty of sentimental and dramatic animes and games out there that people really love.

What's the point? 1) aging starts continuing on. They will love the oportunity to continue to get paid without having to actually work. And the studios would love to be able to push a few buttons on their computer and pump out the next Angelina Jolie and Bruce Willis blockbuster... especially if they don't actually have to deal with (asshole) actors.

also, I would like to point out that this is just a discussion on the future, I'm not trying to say this will happen now or even the next few years (except maybe Step 1). People will get more used to this things, as they already are getting used to cgi. etc...