Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cartoonzi OP t1_j4puelx wrote

Last week, The Information reported that Microsoft and OpenAI are working on a ChatGPT-powered version of Bing. A use case that raised eyebrows was ChatGPT's ability to answer questions in concise and straightforward language, which seemed like a much better experience than the one we’re used to on Google.

ChatGPT was alarming enough for Google to declare a "code red" and prioritize the release of its own AI products. Google has been building similar large language models (LLMs) but has been much more secretive and cautious about them. You may recall last summer's controversy when a Google engineer claimed that LaMDA, Google's chatbot, was sentient. And Google even built one of the core technologies powering ChatGPT. We don’t know how powerful Google’s chatbot and other AI products they’ve created are, but we know they have the talent and funds to compete.

Currently, Google commands 85% of the global search market, while Bing only accounts for 9%. So Microsoft doesn’t have as much to lose as Google, which explains its higher risk tolerance in releasing a first-of-its-kind product that could be less reliable and provide false information.

But the bigger news is that Microsoft intends to add OpenAI's chatbot technology to its Office apps. Microsoft Office accounts for 23% of the company's revenue, compared to only 6% from Bing ads.

Having generative AI capabilities built into these Office apps will become a competitive advantage for companies that use them. And every company will end up paying for the premium tier of AI-powered Office apps so they can keep up with their competition.

----------

The integration of generative AI into Office apps will completely change the way we work. I can't wait to see how all of this unfolds...

11

Adognamedbingo t1_j4rf036 wrote

How do you determine that a LLM like chatGPT serve better results when you dont know if the information that it produces is true or not.

This is a huge issue, because these bots are flawed in the way that they are convincing no matter how bad an answer they give.

Also these models are trained on an incredible amount og data, but are not able to crawl the web yet, so any new info will not be taken into consideration by the AI when giving answers.

That is not great if a pandemic breaks out, but neat if you want to know about history.

I think it’s too soon to say it will replace Google’s search engine since it does a totally different job.

In terms of including it in app and automating different tasks I think you’re right it will be a gamechanger soon.

4

SecondAlibi t1_j4skqwb wrote

I think a small caveat against ChatGPT in this sense is that its answer is biased by its training and it only offers a single concise response to a question, whereas Google returns a list of results which the reader can pick and choose which one appeals to their own biases.

3