Submitted by spyser t3_10kzpb8 in Futurology
StarNightLynx t1_j5zii80 wrote
Reply to comment by czk_21 in AI art made me appreciate human art more by spyser
I would argue that permanently storing mathematical representations of an artist's entire body of work to create new images in their style is completely different from "taking inspiration" from other artists. It might also be illegal, but we'll see what comes of the class action lawsuits.
czk_21 t1_j5zsvso wrote
how is it completely different? the artist also remember how that scenery/image looked like, they often paint it while looking at it too
anyone has right to interpret and paint what they see/saw or think about, everyone has right to learn and that should aply to AI as well
[deleted] t1_j63x2j3 wrote
[deleted]
Hostilis_ t1_j610t1y wrote
They're not storing "mathematical representations" in the way you think they are. They're storing neural representations. The neural networks used in these models are based on the brain. So it is actually very similar to how real artists take inspiration from their predecessors. These networks are not "collage machines" piecing together snippets from other artists' work.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments