Submitted by Hypx t3_10pr4iv in Futurology
Racer-Rick t1_j6oqmxy wrote
Reply to comment by xanthraxoid in DARPA wants aircraft that can maneuver with a radically different method by Hypx
1500 feet is still longer then the 1092 foot long super carrier runway… Odd. Where are they planning on launching them from?
xanthraxoid t1_j6pdqy6 wrote
I'm no DARPA-ologist, but I would hypothesise that this spec is for an initial phase to develop / demonstrate the technology, to be potentially followed by a more demanding spec aimed at a potential deployable asset.
Also, bear in mind that by far the majority of aeroplanes don't have to take off from a carrier. While being able to take off from a carrier is definitely a useful feature, being able to take off from a 1500ft runway still opens up a lot of potential places to fly from - old WWII aerodromes, for example. If you have a friendly airport nearby, there's less need to rely on using a carrier (though you'll still have to arrange fuel supply and other support stuff)
Independent-Deer422 t1_j6pfemd wrote
Carrier capability is not a design factor for anything other than carrier aircraft. Everything else operates off a normal airfield.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments