Submitted by Rear-gunner t3_1085n05 in Futurology
orincoro t1_j3sxw5n wrote
Reply to comment by Sleepdprived in Controversial Proposal to Reduce Global Warming Could Threaten Ozone Regeneration by Rear-gunner
The earth receives far more sunlight than plants or animals need to survive and thrive. Reducing solar insolation by a few percent will have zero impact on life.
ErstwhileAdranos t1_j3vmxh1 wrote
“Zero impact” would be false. You can’t change something like that by “a few percent” and have a 0% change.
orincoro t1_j3vpzea wrote
Of course. Obviously we’d be doing it to lower temperatures and prevent climate collapse. I mean to say that it would not be harmful to life.
It would have no meaningful impact on the ability of any biosphere on Earth to function as it currently does. We get about 50% more sunlight than we need. The majority of that sunlight (and I mean the enormously overwhelming majority) is converted into ambient heat.
We know this because when the sun dims by several percent over the course of years, nothing happens on Earth, except global temperatures very slightly drop.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments