Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ItsAConspiracy t1_j3qzwk1 wrote

That's a problem with using sulfur dioxide, but using calcite particles instead would actually help repair the ozone layer.

33

serinob t1_j3w6cq2 wrote

I have no idea of the chemistry involved in any of these process, or your knowledge on this topic, but I’m about damn near ready to start spraying calcite all over my back yard.

amazon shopping list search for “calcite particles”

1

ItsAConspiracy t1_j3wo3n7 wrote

It's an extremely common mineral, found in all sorts of different rocks. You already have some in your backyard.

1

serinob t1_j3wv2kj wrote

starts digging back yard and throwing dirt in air

1

Chemical_Knowledge64 t1_j3v2dq3 wrote

Which one would be more cost effective?

0

ItsAConspiracy t1_j3woj6v wrote

Calcite is a very common mineral, but I don't know which has more cooling effect for the same mass. But neither one is likely to be expensive, and preserving the ozone layer is a pretty huge benefit.

2

Kaeny t1_j3v5n2c wrote

In the long term? Def not sulfur dioxide. We all gonna die

1