Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GlassAmazing4219 OP t1_j555gh2 wrote

I don’t feel fooled by it, I work with ML professionally so I have a fairly good idea about how it was created. It’s not scraping jokes and swapping animals. I wrote that I was “surprised” by it, and I am. The model can make linguistical connections between colloquial metaphors and unrelated facts about animals and wrap it up into an (albeit dad-like) holistic framework. It’s really impressive.

0

-1KingKRool- t1_j557366 wrote

Or perhaps, it made the connection between punchline “holds its cards too close to its chest!”, the premise for the joke (not being invited to play poker) and a subject (an animal).

Much like a psychic does, it gave you a vague answer, and you made the connection and attributed intent of actions on its part in your mind.

Further proof is the person who repeated your test with another animal (to whom the posture would absolutely not apply) and it gave the same punchline, just with that animal.

7

kylemesa t1_j557xsb wrote

What about the top comment proving all of your theories wrong with the Pelican joke?

1