Submitted by Ludwik2006 t3_10ly86e in Futurology
timegoodaforhere t1_j5zydqs wrote
Reply to comment by Darkwaxellence in doomsday clock real or fake? by Ludwik2006
Wtf does this have to do with my comments?
[deleted] t1_j600dae wrote
[removed]
Darkwaxellence t1_j5zz46w wrote
They don't have to drop a bomb out of an airplane. Every spy satellite in the Eastern hemisphere would see it coming. Conventional ICBM launches and Stratospheric bombers are easily tracked and could be destroyed before reaching target and also allowing time for retaliatory strikes.
No one is dropping or launching.
jgzman t1_j616u8h wrote
> Conventional ICBM launches . . . could be destroyed before reaching target
Source, please?
> They put dirty bombs in vans not airplanes.
It takes a while to get vans to the target, unless you've pre-positioned them. Plus, a ground-burst is not gonna do the kind of city-obliterating damage an airburst does.
timegoodaforhere t1_j5zz99g wrote
Drop is a euphamism ffs.
Darkwaxellence t1_j5zzuic wrote
Not when you're talking about nuclear devices. People should understand what the realistic threats are. I agree that Putin does not want to get annihilated by a retaliation strike. So they would be much more subtle. No one would immediately know who to counter-strike against. There are at least 8 countries in the euro-African sphere that have nuclear weapons and some reason to want to use them.
timegoodaforhere t1_j601esn wrote
Oh fuck off mate. Cba with pedantic bell ends on Reddit telling me what it means when I say something.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments