Submitted by Scarppetta t3_10l6mks in Futurology
[deleted] t1_j5v0kpi wrote
[deleted]
Orcus424 t1_j5v4irr wrote
The government is building it not some company trying to make a profit. They are doing something to help their citizens. I know that sounds like an odd thing depending on what country you are living in.
> So while spending €60 million on an underwater bike garage might still seem like an impossible luxury for most cities, in Amsterdam it’s more like a sound infrastructure investment. “It’s a drop in the bucket compared to investments for highway expansions,” Glaser says, “not to mention the societal public health costs of congestion, car crashes and car dependency.”
alc4pwned t1_j5w9naj wrote
Many people who agree with you would also argue that suburbs are financially unsustainable because they cost more tax dollars.
Surur t1_j5v7o5o wrote
And only 3,300 tons of CO2.
Scarppetta OP t1_j5v65ly wrote
It’s not always about profit…
alc4pwned t1_j5waug3 wrote
Yes, but the "loss" is money coming out of people's taxes. So you definitely still want to know whether it's breaking even or how much it's short by.
arcanereborn t1_j5v4es4 wrote
There is 1.5 bikes per person in NL versus the 0.3 in the states. Don’t you worry about it, because i got a sneaking suspicion you aren’t dutch.
theOpposites t1_j5vg64m wrote
There are 1.5 (at least) guns per person in America tough, maybe try to compare it as a under Target/Walmart gun storage while you shop at that shop! /S
TheAnonFeels t1_j5v4elu wrote
"The Dutch capital spent $65 million to create a parking structure that
can store 7,000 bicycles in a submerged facility at the city’s central
train station. "
Why do they need to turn a profit? Where were they putting the bikes before then? Makes their mass transit more efficient, its worth a loss.
deaddonkey t1_j5ylcn0 wrote
It’s an amenity, not a for profit business.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments