Submitted by Hall_Pitiful t3_zusumf in Futurology
reconditedreams t1_j1surwv wrote
Reply to comment by GrayBox1313 in What will cheap available AI-generated images lead to? Video? Media? Entertainment? by Hall_Pitiful
You don't need actual sentience to emulate the functional output of sentience to a precise enough degree anymore than you need actual Windows to emulate the functional output of the Windows OS to a precise enough degree.
There's no reason in principle why the output of human sentience can't be emulated to a close enough degree to be almost indistinguishable from the real thing.
The actual hard problem of consciousness is totally irrelevant to the practical question of whether the function of consciousness can be emulated.
GrayBox1313 t1_j1svmoe wrote
Ed I dunno. Emulating doesn’t take thought or sentience. Creating and expressing a point of view does. Dogs, dolphins, Monkeys can’t really do this. Only humans can. So even then sentience isn’t enough.
If you believe that art is synonymous with style then that’s a fundamental conceptual issue that needs to be reunderstood. Van Gogh paintings aren’t about brush strokes and flowers. There’s way more to them.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments