Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lordbruwin t1_j1151e5 wrote

Reply to comment by olbettyboop in What if time travel is impossible because of this? by [deleted]

It’s adorable that you think this makes what I said incorrect.

In fact, please direct yourself to the subheadings about “the causal arrow of time”

0

olbettyboop t1_j12z5ft wrote

I’m not saying your pedantic causality argument is wrong. I’m saying your statement about “locally, things aren’t always changing”. Which is not true, and actually runs counter to your causality argument.

Things are in a constant state of flux. Please show and provide sources on how there is no change and please define what is “locally” in regards to there being no change.

Also, it’s interesting that you call it adorable. Weird thing to say.

1

lordbruwin t1_j12ze3b wrote

The irony of calling me pedantic after this bad faith interpretation of my point. You are not a serious person.

0

olbettyboop t1_j12zjw3 wrote

Nice sources, bum.

0

lordbruwin t1_j12zp4j wrote

Locally is a frame of reference. You need a source for basic physics you clown?

−1

olbettyboop t1_j130v7p wrote

Yes, please provide a source on locally and what it means in the context you provided.

Also, again, please provide a source on your claim that things actually don’t change locally.

1

lordbruwin t1_j131l0n wrote

I’m not going to sit here and explain basic physics to you. Learn it or don’t, I don’t care. Some basic reading comprehension would help too. Just know that you are embarrassing yourself.

−1

olbettyboop t1_j132mqr wrote

Got it. No sources or even any attempt to explain. Have a good rest of the year and take care.

1

lordbruwin t1_j148kb8 wrote

Lol. Yeah you caught me, I didn’t bother to link you to the frame of reference wiki page nor do I have any intention of teaching you basic physics.

−1