Submitted by usererror99 t3_zyibmd in Futurology
jharel t1_j26mpib wrote
Reply to comment by usererror99 in AI sentience, Consciousness, and Free Will by usererror99
It's not going to be a meaningful philosophical discussion if you simply put out an assertion without backing or an actual explanation. That's just arguing via assertions.
usererror99 OP t1_j26n7uj wrote
The only assertion I made was the definition of sentience. And the best conversations are arguments.
usererror99 OP t1_j26na24 wrote
Definition of consciousness ^ I meant
jharel t1_j26ns3r wrote
I don't see how that makes the assertion I mentioned any more true. It doesn't seem to be supported by much of anything.
usererror99 OP t1_j26o6ui wrote
How else does one feel?
jharel t1_j26okrj wrote
Let me repeat my reply in a different way:
See what you said below. How is that supported by anything else you've said?
>Theoretically, you could just plug ChatGPT (or any other deep learningmodel) to an artificial nervous system and it would be (technically)sentient.
usererror99 OP t1_j26osh1 wrote
And I answered "how else does one feel?"
jharel t1_j27bfvt wrote
How one "feel" has nothing to do with ChatGPT.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments