Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

usererror99 OP t1_j26c28y wrote

Reply to comment by jharel in AI sentience, Consciousness, and Free Will by usererror99

Not looking for followers just a meaningful philosophical conversation and this topic is easiest to bridge the physical world with the others.

That and I'm beginning to hate the word sentient.

1

jharel t1_j26mpib wrote

It's not going to be a meaningful philosophical discussion if you simply put out an assertion without backing or an actual explanation. That's just arguing via assertions.

2

usererror99 OP t1_j26n7uj wrote

The only assertion I made was the definition of sentience. And the best conversations are arguments.

1

usererror99 OP t1_j26na24 wrote

Definition of consciousness ^ I meant

1

jharel t1_j26ns3r wrote

I don't see how that makes the assertion I mentioned any more true. It doesn't seem to be supported by much of anything.

1

usererror99 OP t1_j26o6ui wrote

How else does one feel?

1

jharel t1_j26okrj wrote

Let me repeat my reply in a different way:

See what you said below. How is that supported by anything else you've said?

>Theoretically, you could just plug ChatGPT (or any other deep learningmodel) to an artificial nervous system and it would be (technically)sentient.

1

usererror99 OP t1_j26osh1 wrote

And I answered "how else does one feel?"

1

jharel t1_j27bfvt wrote

How one "feel" has nothing to do with ChatGPT.

1