jwhildeb t1_j1z83p8 wrote
Not remotely in our lifetimes, if ever, but Star Trek replicators and transporters would be that kind of huge shift. Energy-to-matter conversion with subatomic control.
ovirt001 t1_j1zcsc4 wrote
3D printers are primitive replicators. Scientists have managed to make ones that print on the nanoscale so we really aren't terribly far off from true replicators.
https://engineering.purdue.edu/ME/News/2021/no-more-jagged-edges-nanoscale-3d-printing-that-is-fast-smooth-and-repeatable
minde0815 OP t1_j1zdwng wrote
this is a very interesting thought.
jwhildeb t1_j1zlczc wrote
Kinda, but aside from scale the fundamental difference is that 3D printers can only make things out of the substance they're fed. Replicators eliminate basically every type of scarcity, globally and locally. THAT'S the fire-like paradigm shift.
ovirt001 t1_j1zn0p6 wrote
If all that is needed is some generic set of substances, it's a huge improvement over existing manufacturing technology. That said, the underlying science has been proven so it's not completely outlandish:
https://www.inverse.com/science/einstein-light-matter
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments