Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Best-Responsibility9 t1_iyt07if wrote

I can confirm this is true. I'm a surgical neurophysiologist who published a book detailing the science and stories of (tPBM), in addition to three other brain health-boosting technologies. Within this book called Neuro Alchemy is an entire chapter dedicated to discussing the remarkable research and stories about photobiomodulation. I hope you will all find this book enjoyable to read ! https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08CWD65TV

7

Bodhgaya t1_iz9s396 wrote

/u/Best-Responsibility9, I've recently begun delving into tDCS and tACS, and also very interested in the Vielight but I can't justify the money for that yet. I'm making an effort to understand how these three approaches compare to what's been found at Stanford and led to developing the SAINT protocol. Considering that Dr. Nolan Williams team found that most durable effect comes from short, repeated (successively over a 3-day period) TMS on the left DLPFC, specifically targeting the anterior cingulate. It would seem to a layperson that tDCS is the sledgehammer and r-tMS is the scalpel. Of the home-use options, none of the current tech can target that spot other than TMS, yet still seem to be effective. My question is do you think tDCS/tACS is as effective as tPBM? Would you guess it's 50% as effective? 95% as effective?

1